Immunochips – modern tools for specific detection of pathogenic biological agents
https://doi.org/10.35825/2587-5728-2026-10-1-44-63
Abstract
Highlights Immunochip technology provides multiplex (simultaneous) identification of a wide spectrum of pathogens and toxins with high sensitivity and rapid analysis time (15–30 minutes). Its key advantages – the potential for miniaturization and automation – determine its suitability for creating a new generation of field biological reconnaissance tools. Relevance. The rapid detection and identification of biological threats is a critical task for ensuring troop safety. Existing field detection methods lack the necessary multiplexing capability and speed, which delays situational assessment and decision-making. Purpose of the study is to analyze modern multianalyte immunochip technologies and assess the prospects for their adaptation and application in equipping Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical (NBC) defense troops to enhance the effectiveness of biological reconnaissance. Study base sources. An analysis of data from open international scientific databases (Scopus, PubMed), publications in peer-reviewed journals, conference materials, and patent documents related to the development and application of immunochips for the detection of pathogenic biological agents was conducted. Research method. Methods of systematic analysis and synthesis of scientific and technical information were applied. Various immunochip platforms (planar, suspension, microfluidic) and detection principles (optical, electrochemical) were reviewed. Results. The characteristics of modern immunochip systems capable of detecting the causative agents of anthrax, plague, tularemia, botulinum toxins, ricin, and other agents with high sensitivity (up to 103 CFU/ml for bacteria, single ng/ml for toxins) have been systematized. Conclusion. Immuno-chip technology has reached a level suitable for creating a new generation of field biological reconnaissance tools. Its implementation will allow for the transition to operational multiplex threat screening, which will significantly improve the effectiveness of CBRN defense forces. The development of unified and adaptive platforms is a promising area. Practical significance of the work. The results of the work form the basis for the development of prospective equipment models for RCB Defense troops: 1) mobile multi-component analyzers for laboratories based on complexes like "Sych"; 2) portable detectors for non-standard reconnaissance groups; 3) stationary automated posts for air monitoring at critical facilities. The implementation of such systems will drastically reduce sample collection and analysis time, increasing the timeliness and validity of decisions regarding the biological protection of troops.
About the Authors
E. R. ZiganshinRussian Federation
Eduard R. Ziganshin. Senior researcher of the Scientific and Researcher Department.
A. A. Kytmanov
Russian Federation
Aleksey A. Kytmanov. Researcher of the Scientific and Researcher Department. Cand. Sci. (Biol.).
D. V. Pechenkin
Russian Federation
Denis V. Pechenkin. Chief of the Scientific and Researcher Department. Dr. Sci. (Med.).
A. V. Kuznetsovsky
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Kuznetsovsky. Chief of the Department of Planning of Scientific and Researcher – Deputy Chief of the Branch. Cand. Sci. (Biol.).
A. A. Vorobev
Russian Federation
Aleksey А. Vorobev. Leading Researcher. Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Senior Researcher.
References
1. Chang TW. Binding of cells to matrixes of distinct antibodies coated on solid surface. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1-2):217-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90318-6
2. Ekins RP. Multi-analyte immunoassay. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1989;7(2):155-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0731-7085(89)80079-2
3. Drmanac R, Labat I, Brukner I, Crkvenjakov R. Sequencing of megabase plus DNA by hybridization: theory of the method. Genomics. 1989;4(2):114-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-7543(89)90290-5
4. Lastochkina OV, Gorelov PV. Biological microchips – a new level of laboratory research. Analytics. 2017;36(5):76-8 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22184/2227-572X.2017.36.5.76.86
5. Shpilevaya MV, Runina AV, Filippova MA, Kubanov AA. Comparison of immunochips for the diagnosis of syphilis, made using copolymerization immobilization technology and contactless printing. Clinical laboratory diagnostics. 2020;65(1):16-23 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/0869-2084-2020-65-1-16-23
6. Kulakova II, Lisichkin GV. Biosensors based on graphene nanomaterials. Vestn. Mosk. Univ. 2022;63(6):375-94 (In Russ.).
7. Gandhi M. Modelling Prospects of Bio-Electrochemical Immunosensing Platforms. Electrochem. 2024;5(2):146-161. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem5020010
8. Kondzior M, Grabowska I. Antibody-Electroactive Probe Conjugates Based Electrochemical Immunosensors. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(7):2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20072014
9. Kourti D, Angelopo ulou M, Petrou P, Kakabakos S. Optical Immunosensors for Bacteria Detection in Food Matrices. Chemosensors. 2023;11(8):430. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11080430
10. Singh АК, Mittal S, Das М, Saharia A, Tiwari M. Optical biosensors: a decade in review. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2023;67:673-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.12.040
11. Pohanka M. Immunosensors for Assay of Toxic Biological Warfare Agents. Biosensors. 2023;13(3):402. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13030402
12. Katey B, Voiculescu I, Penkova AN, Untaroiu A. ASME Open J. Engineering. 2023;2:020201. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063500
13. Naresh V, Lee N. A Review on Biosensors and Recent Development of Nanostructured Materials-Enabled Biosensors. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(4):1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041109
14. Polat EO, Cetin MM, Tabak AF, Bilget Güven E, Uysal BÖ, Arsan T, et al. Transducer Technologies for Biosensors and Their Wearable Applications. Biosensors. 2022;12(6):385. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12060385
15. Schulz K, Pöhlmann C, Dietrich R, Märtlbauer E, Elßner T. An Electrochemical Fiveplex Biochip Assay Based on Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies for Fast On-Site Detection of Bioterrorism Relevant Low Molecular Weight Toxins. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(12):696. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11120696
16. Pöhlmann С, Bellanger L, Drevinek M, Elßner T. Multiplex Detection of Biothreat Agents Using an Automated Electrochemical ELISA Platform. Procedia Technology. 2017;27:104-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2017.04.045
17. Nikitin MYu, Katsalukha VV, Shchelgachev VV. Multiplex analysis systems: prospects for use in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Military medical journal. 2020;4:48-55 (In Russ.).
18. Poltavchenko AG, Ersh AV, Filatov PV, Ushkalenko ND. Multiplex dot immunoassay in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Cheboksary: Publishing house "Sredа"; 2022. 224 р. (In Russ.).
19. Shalaev PV, Bondina EV, Sankova NN, Parkhomchuk EV, Dolgushin SA. Synthesis and experimental study of liquid dispersions of magnetic fluorescent polystyrene microspheres. Condensed Matter and Interfaces. 2021; 23(1):108–121 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2021.23/3312
20. Mi F, Hu C, Wang Y, Wang L, Peng F, Geng P, Guan M. Recent advancements in microfluidic chip biosensor detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022;414(9):2883-902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03872-w
21. Açıkgöz HN, Karaman A, Şahin MA, Çaylan ÖR, Büke GC, Yıldırım E, et al. Assessment of silicon, glass, FR4, PDMS and PMMA as a chip material for acoustic particle/cell manipulation in microfluidics. Ultrasonics. 2023;129:106911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106911
22. Wang S, Guan X, Sun S. Microfluidic Biosensors: Enabling Advanced Disease Detection. Sensors. 2025;25(6):1936. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25061936
23. Pattanayak P, Singh SK, Gulati M, Vishwas S, Kapoor B, Chellappan DK, et al. Microfluidic chips: recent advances, critical strategies in design, applications and future perspectives. Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2021;25(12):99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-021-02502-2
24. Zhang J, Ma C, Du Y, Huang J, Xue L. Microfluidic biosensors for rapid detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria: recent advances and future perspectives. Front Chem. 2025;13:1536928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2025.1536928
25. Germanchuk VG, Utkin DV, Shcherbakova SA. Analysis of modern methods and means of rapid indication of toxins. Problems of especially dangerous infections. 2012;2(112):51-4 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2012-2(112)
26. Gryadunov DA, Shaskolsky BL, Nasedkina TV, Rubina AY, Zasedatelev AS. Technology of hydrogel biochips of the Institute of Biomedicine of the Russian Academy of Sciences: 30 years later. Acta Natural. 2018;10(4):4-18 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32607/20758251-2018-10-4-4-18
27. Bekman NI, Pomelova VG, Osin NS. Multiplex analysis of narcotic drugs based on Phosphan immunochip technology. Clinical laboratory diagnostics. 2018;63(3):178–83 (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0869-2084-2018-63-3-178-183
28. Osin NS, Bekman NI, Pomelova VG, Grantseva NKh. Method of multi-analyte immunoassay. RU 2593787; 2016 (In Russ).
29. Ternovoy VA, Sementsova AV, Chub EV, P’Yankov OV, Loktev VB, Agafonov AP. Highly Effective xMAP Multiplex Assay for the Detection and Identification of Hemorrhagic Fever Agents, Including Ebola Virus. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2015;(3):94-7 (In Russ).
30. Pauly D, Kirchner S, Stoermann B, Schreiber T, Kaulfuss S, Schade R, et al. Simultaneous quantification of five bacterial and plant toxins from complex matrices using a multiplexed fluorescent magnetic suspension assay. Analyst. 2009;134(10):2028-39. https://doi.org/10.1039/b911525k
31. Bai X, Hu C, Chen L, Wang J, Li Y, Wan W, et al. A Self-Driven Microfluidic Chip for Ricin and Abrin Detection. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(9):3461. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093461
32. Pöhlmann C, Elßner T. Multiplex Immunoassay Techniques for On-Site Detection of Security Sensitive Toxins. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(11):727. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110727
33. Gehring AG, Brewster JD, He Y, Irwin PL, Paoli GC, Simons T, et al. Antibody Microarray for E. coli O157:H7 and Shiga Toxin in Microtiter Plates. Sensors. 2015;15(12):30429-42. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151229807
34. Soares RR, Novo P, Azevedo AM, Fernandes P, Aires-Barros MR, Chu V, et al. On-chip sample preparation and analyte quantification using a microfluidic aqueous two-phase extraction coupled with an immunoassay. Lab. Chip. 2014;14(21):4284-94. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc00695j
35. Нu H, Deng YJ, Zou J. Microfluidic smectite-polymer nanocomposite strip sensor for Aflatoxin detection. J IEEE Sens. 2013;13(5):1835-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2013.2242057
36. Nolan P, Auer S, Spehar A, Oplatowska-Stachowiak M, Campbell K. Evaluation of Mass Sensitive Micro Array biosensors for their feasibility in multiplex detection of low molecular weight toxins using mycotoxins as model compounds. Talanta. 2021;222:121521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121521
37. Braun SD, Müller E, Frankenfeld K, Gary D, Monecke S, Ehricht R. A Proof-of-Concept Protein Microarray Based Approach for Serotyping of Salmonella enterica Strains. Pathogens. 2024;13(5):355. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13050355
38. Hormsombut T, Mekjinda N, Kalasin S, Surareungchai W, Rijiravanich P. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Enhanced Microarray Technology for Highly Sensitive Simultaneous Detection of Multiplex Foodborne Pathogens. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024;7(4):2367-2377. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.4c00005
39. Wang B, Park B, Chen J, He X. Rapid and Label-Free Immunosensing of Shiga Toxin Subtypes with Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(5):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12050280
40. Sforza ML, Petronella F, De Biase D, Zaccagnini F, Lim S.I, Butt UA, et al. Cascade structured plasmonic liquid crystal biosensor for the rapid detection of harmful bacteria dispersed in potable water. Adv. Sens. Res. 2024;3(8):2300201. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsr.202300201
41. Zhang J, Ma C, Du Y, Huang J, Xue L. Microfluidic biosensors for rapid detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria: recent advances and future perspectives. Front Chem. 2025;13:1536928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2025.1536928
42. Schulz K, Pöhlmann C, Dietrich R, Märtlbauer E, Elßner T. Electrochemical Biochip Assays Based on Anti-idiotypic Antibodies for Rapid and Automated On-Site Detection of Low Molecular Weight Toxins. Front Chem. 2019;7:31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00031
43. Pöhlmann C, Elßner T. Multiplex Immunoassay Techniques for On-Site Detection of Security Sensitive Toxins. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(11):727. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110727
44. Adunphatcharaphon S, Kolawole O, Sooksimuang T, Panchan W, Wasuthep W, Petdum A, et al. A multiplex microarray lateral flow immunoassay device for simultaneous determination of five mycotoxins in rice. NPJ Sci Food. 2024;8(1):116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-024-00342-2
45. Zhang X, Wang Z, Fang Y, Sun R, Cao T, Paudyal N, et al. Antibody Microarray Immunoassay for Simultaneous Quantification of Multiple Mycotoxins in Corn Samples. Toxins. 2018;10(10):415. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10100415
Review
For citations:
Ziganshin E.R., Kytmanov A.A., Pechenkin D.V., Kuznetsovsky A.V., Vorobev A.A. Immunochips – modern tools for specific detection of pathogenic biological agents. Journal of NBC Protection Corps. 2026;10(1):44-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35825/2587-5728-2026-10-1-44-63
JATS XML




















