International Terrorism Using Toxic Chemicals as an Element of Hybrid Warfare
https://doi.org/10.35825/2587-5728-2023-7-1-36-52
EDN: keesjz
Abstract
Modern terrorism is a complex system that consists of a complex of complementary processes – ideological, criminal, military, political, religious and nationalistic. Chemical terrorism is one of the elements of hybrid warfare – a new technology in the fight for the reorganization of the world at the present stage.
The purpose of this article is to consider one of the elements of hybrid wars – chemical terrorism.
Sources and informational basis of the research, methodology. In this work, the sources published by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) were used. The publications available through the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, eLibrary, etc. were also studied. Research method – system analysis. The probability of the use of chemical warfare agents and toxic chemicals by terrorists of various ideological orientations as part of a hybrid war strategy has been studied.
The discussion of the results. Hybrid military conflicts of a non-classical nature involve the participation of international terrorist organizations in hostilities. The Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction (CWC) does not explicitly prohibit non-state actors from obtaining and using chemical weapons. This situation is very convenient for the states that have signed the CWC and use terrorist organizations as part of the strategy of indirect action. In such cases the information and psychological operations are aimed at the collapse and fragmentation of countries, undermining their ability to resist, discrediting their leaders, and causing a split in the ranks of the allies. This was most clearly shown in the incidents with the use of toxic chemicals in Syria.
Conclusion. Working groups under the auspices of the UN and the OPCW, sent to Syria to investigate incidents with the use of sarin, proved unable to conduct objective investigations. They usually ended up on the side of the sponsors of chemical terrorist attacks, despite the evidence of falsification. This, in turn, can lead to serious military conflicts, for which the role of casus belli will be played by false news from the global media. The only mechanism that made it possible to stop such provocations in Syria was a public warning from the Russian side about the place and time of the planned false flag attack. At the same time, such a selective position of the UN and the OPCW can at any moment lead to the loss of the control over chemical weapons in certain regions of the world.
About the Authors
E. N. GlotovRussian Federation
Evgeny Nikolaevich Glotov, Senior Researcher, Candidate of Chemical Sciences, Associate Professor
111024
Entuziastov Passage, 19
Moscow
V. P. Kotov
Russian Federation
Vladimir Pavlovich Kotov, Researcher
111024
Entuziastov Passage, 19
Moscow
I. A. Lozanov
Russian Federation
Ivan Alekseevich Lozanov, Head of the Department, Candidate of Chemical Sciences
111024
Entuziastov Passage, 19
Moscow
M. L. Makarov
Russian Federation
Mikhail Leontievich Makarov, Senior Researcher. Candidate of Technical Sciences
111024
Entuziastov Passage, 19
Moscow
О. М. Nikitin
Russian Federation
Oleg Mikhailovich Nikitin, Senior Researcher, Candidate of Chemical Sciences
111024
Entuziastov Passage, 19
Moscow
А. М. Fleyer
Russian Federation
Alexander Mikhailovich Fleyer, Deputy Head of the Department
111024
Entuziastov Passage, 19
Moscow
N. I. Shilo
Russian Federation
Natalya Igorevna Shilo, Researcher
111024
Entuziastov Passage, 19
Moscow
References
1. Bartosh A.A. Strategy and Counter-Strategy of Hybrid War // Military Thought. 2018. № 10. P. 5–20 (in Russian).
2. Bartosh A.A. Extremism, Terrorism and Separatism as Important Components of the Strategy of the West's Hybrid War against Russia // Scientific Works of Scientists from the Department of General Problems of War, Peace and the Army of the Academy of Military Sciences. Moscow, 2019. Р. 158–169 (in Russian).
3. Serzhantov A.V., Smolovy A.V., Dolgopolov A.V. Transformation of the Content of War: from Past to Present – Technologies of Hybrid Wars // Military Thought. 2021. № 2. Р. 20–27 (in Russian).
4. Ivashov L.G. Operations of Soft Power in the Hybrid War // Soft Power: Theory and Practice in International Relations. Moscow, 2018. P. 89–108 (in Russian).
5. Moiseev A.I. The Problem of Defining Terrorism in International Law // Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2014. № 12. Р. 2919–2923 (in Russian).
6. Latin-Russian Dictionary / Ed. Dvoretskiy I.Ch. Moscow, 1986. P. 767–768.
7. Bartholomae Ch. Altiranisches Wörterbuch. Strassburg, 1904. P. 644.
8. Weisman A.D. Greek-Russian Dictionary. Reprint of the 5th Edition of 1899. Moscow, 1991. P. 1254.
9. Ziyad Zaher Yedin. Approaches of Islamic Jurists to the Definition of International Terrorism. Source: https://www.sovremennoepravo.ru/ (in Russian).
10. Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Permissible and Forbidden in Islam. Moscow, 2005. P. 301–303.
11. Abd al-Rahman ibn Nasir Saadi. Interpretation of the Holy Quran Relief from the Generous and Merciful. In 2 Vols. V. 1. Moscow: Umma, 2006. P. 724 (in Russian).
12. Kovtun V.A., Kolesnikov D.P., Supotnitskiy M.V., Shilo N.I. Syrian Chemical War // Journal of NBC Protection Corps. 2018. V. 2. № 3. P. 7–39 (in Russian).
13. 2 Case Study: The OPCW in Syria // Peter van Ham, Sico van der Meer, Malik Ellahi. Chemical Weapons Challenges Ahead: The Past and Future of the OPCW, Oct. 1, 2017. P. 29. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep17327.5?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
14. Pita R., Domingo J. The Use of Chemical Weapons in the Syrian Conflict // Toxics. 2014. V. 2. P. 391–402; doi: 10.3390/toxics2030391
15. Chemical Warfare Agents: Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutics / Eds Romano J.A., Jr., Lukey B.J. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. 2008. 744 p.
16. Chemical Warfare Agents: Toxicology and Treatment / Eds Marrs T.C., Maynard R.L., Sidell F.R. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. 2007. 753 p.
17. Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents / Ed. Gupta R.C. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. 2015. 1137 p.
18. Sinitsyn A.N., Glotov E.N., Romanenko S.N. et al. Current State and Prospects for Continuing Research in the Field of Chemistry of Poisonous Substances under the Conditions of the Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons / Ed. Kholstov V.I. Moscow: VAKhZ, 1999. 93 p. (in Russian)
19. Franke S. Lehrbuch der Militärchemie. Band 1. Deutscher Militärverlang. Berlin, 1967.
20. Los K. Synthetic Poisons / Translation from German. Moscow: Publ. House of Foreign Literature, 1963. 259 p.
21. Fild M., Handke W. Methylene Compounds of Nonmetals. V. Methylenediphosphorus halides // Zeitschrift fuer Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie. 1987. V. 555. P. 109–117.
22. Okumura T., Suzuki K., Fukuda A. et al. The Tokyo Subway Sarin Attack: Disaster Management, Part 1: Community Emergency Response // Acad. Emerg. Med. 1998. V. 5. № 6. P. 613–617. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02470.x
23. Grob D., Harvey A.M. The Effects and Treatment of Nerve Gas Poisoning // Am. J. Med. 1953. V. 14. P. 52–63.
24. Grob D. The Manifestations and Treatment of Poisoning Due to Nerve Gas and Other Organic Phosphate Anticholinesterase Compounds // Arch. Int. Med. 1956. V. 98. P. 221–239.
25. Grob D., Harvey J.C. Effects in Man of the Anticholinesterase Compound Sarin (isopropyl methyl phosphonofluoridate) // J. Clin. Invest. 1958. V. 37. P. 350–368.
Review
For citations:
Glotov E.N., Kotov V.P., Lozanov I.A., Makarov M.L., Nikitin О.М., Fleyer А.М., Shilo N.I. International Terrorism Using Toxic Chemicals as an Element of Hybrid Warfare. Journal of NBC Protection Corps. 2023;7(1):36-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35825/2587-5728-2023-7-1-36-52. EDN: keesjz